Premier Sales and Marketing, Incorporated v. Peiker Acustic, Incorporated
Filing
47
ORDER Adopting 45 Report and Recommendation, denying 24 Motion to Compel, filed by Peiker Acustic, Incorporated Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PREMIER SALES & MARKETING, INC., Case No. 09-CV-10610 Plaintiff, -vsPEIKER ACUSTIC, INC., Defendant. _______________________________/ ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. NO. 45); and (2) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AT THIS STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS (DKT. NO. 24) Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's February 16, 2010 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 45) denying Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. No. 24). Neither party has filed timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d). Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's conclusions of fact and discussion of law, the Court hereby: (1) (3) ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 45); and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration at this stage of the proceedings. (Dkt. No. 24). PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SO ORDERED.
S/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 24, 2010
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on March 24, 2010. S/Denise Goodine Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?