Coleman v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.

Filing 27

ORDER for Briefing Regarding Stay of Case. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Beatriz H. Coleman, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER Plaintiffs Beatriz H. Coleman and John T. Coleman filed this action in state court, asserting claims against Defendants Chase Bank USA, N.A. and Chase Home Finance, LLC. Defendants removed the action to this Court on February 20, 2009. At a recent status conference, Plaintiffs' Counsel advised the Court that Beatriz H. Coleman recently filed for bankruptcy. On June 16, 2009, the parties agreed that John T. Coleman's claims in this action would be dismissed with prejudice. (Docket Entry No. 26). The parties further agreed that John T. Coleman would "provide and participate in discovery" in this action following his dismissal. (Id.). Plaintiffs' Counsel has indicated to the Court that he believes that this action is subject to an automatic bankruptcy stay. Defense Counsel does not agree that this action is subject to an automatic stay because the alleged bankrupt party is the plaintiff in this action, not the defendant. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiffs' counsel to submit a brief of no more than five (5) pages by July 10, 2009, providing authority for Plaintiff Beatriz H. Coleman's position that her claims in this action are subject to an automatic stay. Defendants shall file a brief setting forth their position on the same issue by July 24, 2009. Case No. 09-10640 Honorable Sean F. Cox IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Sean F. Cox Sean F. Cox United States District Judge Dated: July 1, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on July 1, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Jennifer Hernandez Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?