Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al

Filing 209

ORDER to Remove Image and File Under Seal 205 Response to Motion, filed by Weather Underground, Incorporated. Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (BSoc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND, INC.,
a Michigan corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.

Case No. 2:09-CV-10756
Hon. Marianne O. Battani

NAVIGATION CATALYST SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation;
CONNEXUS CORP., a Delaware
corporation; FIRSTLOOK, INC., a
Delaware corporation; and EPIC
MEDIA GROUP, INC., a Delaware
corporation;
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________
Enrico Schaefer (P43506)
Brian A. Hall (P70865)
TRAVERSE LEGAL, PLC
810 Cottageview Drive, Unit G-20
Traverse City, MI 49686
231-932-0411
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Lead Attorneys for Plaintiff
Anthony P. Patti (P43729)
HOOPER HATHAWAY, PC
126 South Main Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
734-662-4426
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Nicholas J. Stasevich (P41896)
Benjamin K. Steffans (P69712)
Bruce L. Sendek (P28095)
BUTZEL LONG, PC
150 West Jefferson, Suite 100
Detroit, MI 48226
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Local Counsel for Defendants

William A. Delgado (admitted pro hac vice)
WILLENKEN WILSON LOH & LIEB LLP
707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 3850
Los Angeles, CA 90017
[phone]
[e-mail]
Lead Counsel for Defendants
______________________________________________________________________
ORDER TO REMOVE IMAGE AND FILE UNDER SEAL

On August 15, 2011, Plaintiff The Weather Underground filed its response to
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment with exhibits (Dkt. No. 205). On August 23,
2011, Defendants requested that certain portions of Plaintiff’s Response Memorandum
be redacted and for Plaintiff to refile its Memorandum redacted and to seal the full
document. Based on a stipulation between the parties, Plaintiff requests that its
Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment be removed and filed under
seal and that Plaintiff be permitted to file a redacted version of its Response
Memorandum.
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment Memorandum is hereby removed by the Clerk of the Court from the
Docket and filed under seal. Plaintiff is permitted to file a redacted version of its
Response Memorandum.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Marianne O. Battani
MARIANNE O. BATTANI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: August 26, 2011

Page 2 of 2