Richardson v. Scutt

Filing 13

ORDER denying 10 Motion for Specific Discovery. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TYRELL RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. DEBRA L. SCUTT, Respondent. ______________________________/ ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY I. This is a habeas case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner Tyrell Richardson is a state inmate at the G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility in Jackson, Michigan. Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he is incarcerated in violation of his constitutional rights. Before the Court is Petitioner's motion for specific discovery, filed on October 8, 2009 [dkt. # 10]. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. II. As a general rule, "[a] habeas petitioner, unlike the usual civil litigant in federal court, is not entitled to discovery as a matter of ordinary course." Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899, 904 (1997). Respondent has not yet filed the necessary Rule 5 materials, which are due by November 4, 2009. After the Court receives the necessary Rule 5 materials, and after a careful review of those materials, it will then determine whether Case No. 09-cv-11088 Honorable Avern Cohn additional discovery is necessary to resolve Petitioner's claims. Petitioner need not file any additional motions regarding this issue. SO ORDERED. s/ Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 20, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed Tyrell Richardson, 601396, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility, 3500 N. Elm Road, Jackson, MI 49201 to the attorneys of record on this date, October 20, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/ Julie Owens Case Manager, (313) 234-5160 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?