Lango v. Davis

Filing 3

ORDER Transferring Case to USCA for the Sixth Circuit. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (DeSa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RUFUS LANGO, Petitioner, v. BARRY DAVIS, Respondent. ___________________________/ ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) Petitioner Rufus Lango, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the Newberry Correctional Facility in Newberry, Michigan, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In 2004, Petitioner was convicted of (1) felony murder, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 750.316B, (2) three counts of assault with intent to rob while armed, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 750.89, (3) assault with intent to murder, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 750.83, and (4) felony firearm, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 750.227BA, in the Wayne County, Michigan, Circuit Court. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murder conviction, three eighteen- to thirty-year terms for the assault convictions, and the mandatory two years in prison for the felony-firearm conviction. Petitioner filed a prior petition in federal court challenging the same convictions and sentences, which was dismissed. See Lango v. Lafler, No. 06-CV-12228 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 2009) (Battani, J.). For the Case Number: 09-CV-12290 Honorable Avern Cohn following reasons, the Court concludes that it must transfer this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"), codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2241 et seq, amended 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2253, and 2254, govern habeas corpus proceedings in federal courts. Pursuant to those amendments, an individual seeking to file a "second or successive" habeas petition must ask the appropriate court of appeals for an order directing the district court to consider the petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637, 641 (1998). This requirement transfers to the court of appeals a screening function which the district court previously performed. Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 664 (1996). Petitioner has not obtained appellate authorization to file a subsequent petition as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to transfer this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 and Sims v. Terbush, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997). SO ORDERED. s/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 22, 2009 2 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record and Rufus Lango #498304 at Newberry Correctional Facility, 3001 Newberry Avenue, Newberry, MI 49868-1340 on this date, June 22, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry Case Manager, (313) 234-5160 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RUFUS LANGO, Petitioner, v. BARRY DAVIS, Respondent. ___________________________/ ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) Petitioner Rufus Lango, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the Newberry Correctional Facility in Newberry, Michigan, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In 2004, Petitioner was convicted of (1) felony murder, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 750.316B, (2) three counts of assault with intent to rob while armed, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 750.89, (3) assault with intent to murder, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 750.83, and (4) felony firearm, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 750.227BA, in the Wayne County, Michigan, Circuit Court. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murder conviction, three eighteen- to thirty-year terms for the assault convictions, and the mandatory two years in prison for the felony-firearm conviction. Petitioner filed a prior petition in federal court challenging the same convictions and sentences, which was dismissed. See Lango v. Lafler, No. 06-CV-12228 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 2009) (Battani, J.). For the Case Number: 09-CV-12290 Honorable Avern Cohn following reasons, the Court concludes that it must transfer this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"), codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2241 et seq, amended 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2253, and 2254, govern habeas corpus proceedings in federal courts. Pursuant to those amendments, an individual seeking to file a "second or successive" habeas petition must ask the appropriate court of appeals for an order directing the district court to consider the petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637, 641 (1998). This requirement transfers to the court of appeals a screening function which the district court previously performed. Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 664 (1996). Petitioner has not obtained appellate authorization to file a subsequent petition as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to transfer this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 and Sims v. Terbush, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997). SO ORDERED. s/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 22, 2009 2 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record and Rufus Lango #498304 at Newberry Correctional Facility, 3001 Newberry Avenue, Newberry, MI 49868-1340 on this date, June 22, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry Case Manager, (313) 234-5160 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?