Burgess v. Probility Physical Therapy, LLC
Filing
19
ORDER setting telephone conference, ( Telephone Conference set for 6/13/2011 04:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ERICK BURGESS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 09-13019
PROBABILITY PHYSICAL THERAPY, LLC,
Defendant.
/
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
On May 23, 2011, the court conducted a telephone conference to discuss the
parties’ settlement efforts and whether the court should reopen the case. The court is
persuaded that the parties are continuing to make progress toward settlement, and will
therefore decline to issue a scheduling order, at this point. The court will conduct a
telephone conference in two weeks to discuss the status of the document preparation.
If, at that time, the parties have reached an impasse, the court will reopen the case for
appropriate proceedings. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiff Relator, Defendant, and the
Government shall participate in a telephone conference on June 13, 2011, at 4:00 p.m.
In the meantime, the case will remain closed, although the dismissal is without prejudice
until further order of the court. In the event the parties submit a stipulated order of
dismissal or judgment by June 10, 2011, the telephone conference will be canceled.
Nothing in this order shall be deemed to adversely affect or in any way
impact the parties’ rights.
S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 25, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, May 25, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-13019.BURGESS.TelephoneConference.chd.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?