Spencer v. Scutt

Filing 29

ORDER granting 26 Motion for Bond. Signed by District Judge Patrick J. Duggan. (MOre)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FREDERICK TED SPENCER, Petitioner, Case No. 09-13362 v. Honorable Patrick J. Duggan DEBRA SCUTT, Respondent. / ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SET BAIL Petitioner Frederick Spencer (“Petitioner”) is serving a life sentence for felony murder and a two to ten year sentence for arson of a dwelling house and preparation to burn property over $20,000 in connection with a fire at his home in Shepherd, Michigan on January 30, 2000. In 2009, Petitioner timely sought a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which this Court granted in an Opinion and Order dated February 6, 2013. On April 22, 2013, Petitioner filed a motion to set bail seeking to be released pending Respondent’s appeal of this Court’s February 6, 2013 Opinion and Order conditionally granting a writ of habeas corpus. In an Opinion entered on this date, the Court determined that Petitioner is entitled to release pending appeal. Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion to Set Bail, (ECF No. 26), and his concomitant request for release bond pending appeal, is GRANTED. Petitioner shall be released on a $10,000 unsecured bond with conditions to report as directed to Pretrial Services in the Western District of Michigan, restrict travel to the State of Michigan unless prior approval is given by Pretrial Services, consume no alcohol, submit to alcohol testing as directed by Pretrial Services, reside with sister, Coreen Spencer, at the address provided to Pretrial Services, participate in mental health treatment as directed by Pretrial Services, and refrain from any contact with victim’s family or witnesses. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: September 25, 2013 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: David A. Moran Imran J. Syed Sarah C. Zearfoss Linus R. Banghart-Linn 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?