Owens v. Detroit Diesel Corporation et al
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule., Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings as to 9 MOTION to Remand :( Plaintiff's Brief in Support of the Motion to Remand due by 10/19/2009 and Defendant's Response due by 10/30/2009) Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PAULA OWENS, Plaintiff, v. DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. / ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE On August 10, 2009, Plaintiff Paula Owens filed a complaint in Wayne County Circuit Court. Defendant Detroit Diesel Corporation was served on August 19, 2009, and filed a notice of removal to this court on September 10, 2009. A scheduling conference was held on October 7, 2009. At the conference, Plaintiff stated that she would file a motion to remand, which she did on October 9, 2009. Although the local rules provide that every motion must be accompanied by a brief, see E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(c)(1)(A), Plaintiff requested additional time to file a brief in support of the motion. The court indicated that Plaintiff could file a brief in support on or before October 19, 2009, and that Defendant's response would be due on or before October 30, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff may file her brief in support of her motion to remand after filing her motion, but in no event later than October 19, 2009, and Defendant shall file its response on or before October 30, 2009. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 15, 2009 Case No. 09-13583
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, October 15, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa G. Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\09-13583.OWENS.Dates.npk.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?