Harden v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Filing 22

ORDER regarding pro bono counsel request. 19 20 Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
Harden v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PHYLLIS HARDEN, Plaintiff, vs. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Defendant. _____________________________/ ORDER REGARDING PRO BONO COUNSEL REQUEST The court made an effort to find an attorney willing to provide pro bono assistance to plaintiff Phyllis Harden, stating in its May 19, 2010 order that counsel should be appointed to represent plaintiff "if such pro bono counsel is available through a court-sponsored program." (Emphasis in original). The court was advised that an initial effort was unsuccessful, as was a subsequent effort. No further effort will be made by the court to assist Ms. Harden in obtaining counsel, pro bono or otherwise. Accordingly, if plaintiff wishes to file her response to the pending motion to dismiss or for summary judgment she shall do so on or before July 15, 2010. Dated: July 8, 2010 S/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on July 8, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Marcia Beauchemin Deputy Clerk Case No. 09-CV-13778 HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?