Sargent v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 19

ORDER granting in part 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 14 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 16 Report and Recommendation and the decision of the Secretary is REVERSED. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for further review and investigation. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CHem)

Download PDF
Sargent v. Social Security, Commissioner of Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Regina Sargent, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including Defendant's Objections if any, the Court finds that the Magistrate reached the correct conclusion in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and the decision of the Secretary is REVERSED. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for further review and investigation. Case No. 09-13910 Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge Dated: March 3, 2011 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on March 3, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Carol A. Hemeyer Case Manager Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?