Phillip Brown v Carol Howes

Filing 108

ORDER granting 106 Motion To Apply Holdinggranting 107 Motion To Apply HoldingTo Construe Issue VIII-Sec.E. Signed by District Judge Patrick J. Duggan. (MOre)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Phillip Brown, Petitioner, Case No. 09-cv-14850 Honorable Patrick J. Duggan v. David Bergh, Respondent. ______________________________/ ORDER GRANTING G PETITIONER’S MOTION TO APPLY HOLDING [ECF NO. 106] AND MOTION TO CONSTRUE ISSUE VIII-SECTION E [ECF NO. 107] This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 matter is before the Court because Michigan prisoner Phillip Brown (“Petitioner”) has filed yet additional motions to consider supplemental pleadings. The Court notes that Petitioner has filed at least 38 pro se motions in this case as well as numerous supplemental pleadings.1 His latest two motions ask the Court to consider Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S. Ct. 1354 (2004), when considering his third claim, and to construe the eighth issue raised in his habeas petition as raising a “false evidence” claim along with a claim of prosecutorial misconduct. Petitioner has now had 1 Petitioner is represented by counsel. Nevertheless, most of the motions and supplemental pleadings have been filed by Petitioner without counsel’s assistance. 1 more than enough opportunities to file such motions and/or supplemental pleadings. The Court is disinclined to consider any further such pleadings, and after entry of this order it will consider the case ready for disposition. To the extent the motions seek to have the Court consider the arguments raised therein in its dispositive opinion, the motions are GRANTED. SO ORDERED. DATED: February 10, 2014 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: Paul D. Hudson, Esq. Raina I. Korbakis, Esq. Phillip Brown, #271566 Thumb Correctional Facility 3225 John Conley Drive Lapeer, MI 48446 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?