Smith v. McKee

Filing 59

ORDER transferring 58 Rule 60(b)(2) Motion to USCA for the Sixth Circuit. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (DPer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DERAY SMITH, Petitioner, vs. Civil Action No. 09-CV-14876 HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN KENNETH MCKEE Respondent. ___________________/ ORDER TRANSFERRING PETITIONER’S RULE 60(b)(2) MOTION TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT This matter is presently before the Court on petitioner’s “motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(B)(2) newly discovered evidence . . .” [docket entry 58]. The Court dismissed petitioner’s application for the writ in an opinion and order dated May 11, 2012 [docket entry 35] because the application was untimely. Petitioner appealed, but the court of appeals denied his application for a certificate of appealability and his motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. In the interim petitioner had filed a motion for relief from judgment [docket entry 39], as well as various other motions, which the Court recently denied [docket entry 55]. Petitioner has appealed from that order [docket entry 56], and he now has filed the instant motion for relief from judgment [docket entry 58]. The instant motion, in which petitioner again challenges his state conviction and seeks release from prison, appears to be a second or successive habeas petition, and it may not proceed without authorization from the court of appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment [docket entry 58] is hereby transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to In re Sims, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir.1997). Dated: May 24, 2013 Detroit, Michigan _s/ Bernard A. Friedman________ BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?