Turnbow v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
26
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation Granting in Part 20 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Calvin Turnbow, Denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of, and Remanding Matter for Further Administrative Proceedings. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (BSoc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CALVIN TURNBOW,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 09-14989
v.
HONORABLE AVERN COHN
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 25)
AND
DENYING THE COMMISSIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND
GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND
REMANDING MATTER FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
I.
This is a social security case. Plaintiff Calvin Turnbow appeals from the final
determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that he is not
disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was
referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff and the
Commissioner filed cross motions for summary judgment. The magistrate judge issued
a report and recommendation (MJRR) recommending that (1) the Commissioner’s
motion for summary judgment be denied, (2) plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be
granted in part and (3) the matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings.
II.
Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections
has passed. The failure to file objections to the MJRR waives any further right to
appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th
Cir.1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the
Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140,
149 (1985). However, the Court has reviewed the file and the MJRR and agrees with
the magistrate judge.
III.
Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED
as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Commissioner’s motion for summary
judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART.
This matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the
MJRR.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 18, 2011
S/Avern Cohn
AVERN COHN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the
attorneys of record on this date, May 18, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Julie Owens
Case Manager, (313) 234-5160
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?