Lamb v. Wayne County Prosecutor

Filing 10

ORDER granting 7 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID KENDALE LAMB,
Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:09-CV-15003 HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN

v.
WAYNE CO. PROSECUTOR, Defendant.

-------------_----:/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

Michigan prisoner David Kendale Lamb ("Plaintiff') has filed a pro se "Complaint for Declaratory Judgment Pursuant to Rule 57, 28 U.S.c. § 2201 and Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to Rule 65(a)" in which he contests certain evidence from his state criminal trial and seeks re-testing of gunshot residue from his pants and DNA testing of hairs recovered from baseball caps at the scene of the crime. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion to amend his complaint in order to provide a basis for the Court's jurisdiction and clarify that he is bringing this action as a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has submitted a proposed amended complaint with his motion. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend his or her pleadings once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving it or within 21 days after service of a responsive pleading. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(l). Since a responsive pleading has not yet been ordered or filed in this case, Plaintiff has the right to amend the complaint without seeking

1

pennission from the Court. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion to amend and accepts his amended complaint for further review and consideration. The Court makes no determination as to the merits of the amended complaint at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

-PA-l-JL-D-.

(0~-

B-O-RM--A-N----~

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED:

1-(<)"- ( l J

2