Imhoff Investment, L.L.C. v. Alfoccino of Auburn Hills, Inc. et al
Filing
112
OPINION and ORDER Granting Defendants' 111 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's 109 Motion for Class Certification re Text-Only Order Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
AVIO, INC., a Michigan corporation,
Individually and as the representative of a
class of similarly situated persons,
Plaintiff,
No. 2:10-cv-10221
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
vs.
ALFOCCINO, INC., D. TALIERCIO
INVESTMENTS, INC., and FARSHID
(“TONY”) SHUSHTARI
Defendants.
___________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFCIATION
On September 24, 2013, Plaintiff moved for class certification pursuant to
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in this Telephone Consumer
Protection Act matter. (Dkt. # 109). Under this Court’s Amended Scheduling
Order, discovery closes on October 25, 2013. (Dkt. # 98). Defendants now seek a
slight reprieve from the normal 21-day response deadline under Local Rule
7.1(e)(1)(B) because their response is due before discovery cutoff. Accordingly,
Defendants request that this Court extend the response deadline until a week after
discovery cutoff. (Def’s Mtn., Dkt. # 111, at 7). This will permit Defendants to
1
include information garnered during the deposition of Plaintiff’s corporate and
class representative, which is currently scheduled for October 3, 2013. (Id. at 6).
This request is reasonable and the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Motion.
For all of the foregoing reasons,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time
to File a Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification is GRANTED.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file their
response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification no later than November 4,
2013.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that this does not affect any other
dates in the Court’s Amended Scheduling Order, including the dispositive motion
cut-off date of November 25, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 8, 2013
s/Gerald E. Rosen
GERALD E. ROSEN
CHIEF, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys
of record on this date, October 8, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Julie Owens
Case Manager, 313-234-5135
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?