Abner v. Kaye Financial Corporation et al
Filing
41
ORDER denying plaintiff's Motion to Vacate foreclosure 38 . Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RANDOLPH ABNER,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 10-CV-11006
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
vs.
KAYE FINANCIAL CORP.
AND FIDELITY BANK,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE FORECLOSURE (# 38)
This matter comes before the court on plaintiff Randolph Abner’s motion to vacate
the foreclosure and sheriff’s deed on mortgage sale of 19969 Trinity, Detroit, MI 48219.
Plaintiff originally filed his complaint in this case following his default on his mortgage,
which resulted in the scheduling of a sheriff’s sale. The court dismissed plaintiff’s case
after granting both defendants’ motions to dismiss. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, and his
appeal is currently pending before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
According to plaintiff’s current motion to vacate foreclosure, defendant Fidelity Bank
foreclosed on his property on March 3, 2011. Plaintiff objects that the foreclosure was
improperly executed by advertisement under Michigan statute.
This court lacks jurisdiction over the above-captioned matter due to the fact that it
is now pending before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. In addition, plaintiff’s motion to
vacate foreclosure raises issues not before the court in the original complaint. If plaintiff
wants to pursue the matter raised in the present motion, he must file a new case with the
Wayne County Circuit Court.
So ordered.
Dated: June 30, 2011
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
June 30, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also to
Randolph Abner, 19969 Trinity, Detroit, MI 48219.
s/Josephine Chaffee
Deputy Clerk
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?