Varney v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Granting 10 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security and Denying 7 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Gary Allen Varney. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (RGun)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GARY ALLEN VARNEY, Plaintiff, Case No. 10-11082 Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on June 3, 2011 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court On February 10, 2011, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff Gary Allen Varney’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R & R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and the record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety. Accordingly, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s February 10, 2011 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the R & R, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (docket #10) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (docket #7) is DENIED. s/Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: June 3, 2011 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on June 3, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Ruth A. Gunther Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?