Varney v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Granting 10 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security and Denying 7 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Gary Allen Varney. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (RGun)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
GARY ALLEN VARNEY,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 10-11082
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon
v.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
At a session of said Court, held in
the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan
on
June 3, 2011
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
On February 10, 2011, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court grant the Defendant
Commissioner of Social Security’s motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff Gary
Allen Varney’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R &
R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and the
record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and
adopts the R & R in its entirety.
Accordingly,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s
February 10, 2011 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this
Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the R & R,
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (docket #10) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment (docket #7) is DENIED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: June 3, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on June 3, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Ruth A. Gunther
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?