United States of America v. Powers

Filing 37

ORDER Adopting 36 Report and Recommendation for Granting in Part and Denying in Part 30 Motion. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (MacKay, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 10-11280 Timothy Powers, Sean F. Cox United States District Court Judge Defendant, and Residential Skirting Products, Inc., Garnishee-Defendant. ______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING UPDATED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 36) On March 14, 2019, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued an updated Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 36), wherein she recommends that the Court GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Requests to Produce to Garnishee-Defendant. (ECF No. 30). The time permitted for the parties to file objections to that Report and Recommendation has passed and no objections were filed. Moreover, the Court concurs with the analysis and conclusion in the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the March 14, 2019 Report and Recommendation and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Requests to Produce to Garnishee-Defendant (ECF No. 30). 1 Specifically, IT IS ORDERED that Garnishee-Defendant shall provide full and complete responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories and Requests to Produce Documents, without objection, within 21 days of the date of this order. The Court warns Garnishee-Defendant that failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including contempt of Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for entry of a default is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2019 s/ Sean F. Cox Sean F. Cox U. S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?