Bingham et al v. Bank of America et al
Filing
9
ORDER re 7 Request to Adjourn Motion Hearing filed by Mattie Williams, Angela Bingham. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Angela Bingham and Mattie Williams, Plaintiffs, v. Bank of America, NA, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO ADJOURN MOTION HEARING On April 7, 2010, Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendants Bank of America, NA ("BOA") and The Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") in Oakland County Circuit Court. Defendants removed the action to this Court on May 12, 2010. On May 17, 2010, Defendants filed the instant motion. Defendants ask the Court to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). Defendants' further assert that, should the Court choose to treat the motion as a motion for summary judgment, they would be entitled to summary judgment. The Court set the motion for hearing on August 5, 2010. On July 16, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a response to the motion. (Docket Entry No. 7). In that response, Plaintiffs state that they served Defendants with interrogatories on July 9, 2010, and have not yet received the answers. Plaintiffs ask this Court to adjourn the motion hearing so they will have the benefit of Defendants' answers. Specifically, Plaintiffs assert that they need "Defendants' `System Notes' which would show the dialogue between the parties." (Pls.' Resp. Case No. 10-11917 Honorable Sean F. Cox
Br. at 1 & 3). This Court has already adjourned the motion hearing from August 5, 2010, until August 26, 2010, and declines Plaintiff's request to further adjourn the hearing. Defendants' motion is brought pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) and this Court does not intend to convert the motion into a motion for summary judgment under FED. R. CIV. P. 56(c). In addition, in light of the adjournment to August 26, 2010, Plaintiffs should receive the discovery response at issue in advance of the hearing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' request to adjourn the August 26, 2010 hearing is DENIED. The hearing shall proceed as scheduled. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Sean F. Cox Sean F. Cox United States District Judge Dated: July 28, 2010 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on July 28, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Jennifer Hernandez Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?