Kerr v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 16

ORDER Adopting 15 Report and Recommendation, denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jacqueline Marie Kerr, granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of and dismissing case Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (DTyl)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JACQUELINE MARIE KERR, Plaintiff, Case No. 10-12198 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER Defendant. ______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [15], DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [11], GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [14], AND DISMISSING CASE On March 22, 2011, Magistrate Judge Binder issued a Report and Recommendation [15] recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [11] be denied, that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [14] be granted, and that the findings and conclusions of the Commissioner be affirmed. No objections were filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [11] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [14] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint [1] is hereby DISMISSED. Kerr v. Commissioner of Social Security #10-12198 SO ORDERED. S/ARTHUR J. TARNOW Arthur J. Tarnow Senior United States District Judge Dated: April 12, 2011 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on April 12, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/MICHAEL L. WILLIAMS Relief Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?