Kerr v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
16
ORDER Adopting 15 Report and Recommendation, denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jacqueline Marie Kerr, granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of and dismissing case Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (DTyl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JACQUELINE MARIE KERR,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 10-12198
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ARTHUR J. TARNOW
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CHARLES E. BINDER
Defendant.
______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION [15], DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [11], GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [14], AND DISMISSING CASE
On March 22, 2011, Magistrate Judge Binder issued a Report and Recommendation [15]
recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [11] be denied, that Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment [14] be granted, and that the findings and conclusions of the
Commissioner be affirmed.
No objections were filed.
The Court has reviewed the record in this case.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is
entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [11] is
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [14] is
GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s Complaint [1] is hereby DISMISSED.
Kerr v. Commissioner of Social Security
#10-12198
SO ORDERED.
S/ARTHUR J. TARNOW
Arthur J. Tarnow
Senior United States District Judge
Dated: April 12, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on April
12, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/MICHAEL L. WILLIAMS
Relief Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?