Sims v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 6

ORDER PARTIALLY REMANDING CASE to Oakland County Circuit Court. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (PPau)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Charlotte Sims, Plaintiff, v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER REMANDING STATE LAW CLAIM Plaintiff filed this action in Oakland County Circuit Court alleging the following two claims: "Count I ­ R.E.S.P.A. 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.;" and "Count II ­ Violation of M.C.L. § 600.3205a." jurisdiction. Although this Court has federal question jurisdiction over Count I, the remaining count is based on state law. The applicable statute regarding supplemental jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1367, provides, in pertinent part, that district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim when: 1) the claim raises a novel or complex issue of State law; 2) the claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the district court has original jurisdiction; 3) the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction, or 4) in exceptional circumstances, there are other compelling reasons for declining jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Defendant removed the action to this Court, asserting federal question Case No. 10-12230 Honorable Sean F. Cox Having reviewed the state law claims in Plaintiff's complaint, this Court concludes that Plaintiff's state-law claim predominates. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(2). In addition, the Court finds that the potential for jury confusion in this case would be great if Plaintiff's federal claim were presented to a jury along with Plaintiff's state-law claim. Thus, the potential for jury confusion is yet another reasons for this Court to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state-law claims. United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F.Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994); 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby REMANDED to Oakland County Circuit Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Sean F. Cox Sean F. Cox United States District Judge Dated: September 8, 2010 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on September 8, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Jennifer Hernandez Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?