Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund et al v. Municipal and Industrial Storage, Incorporated et al

Filing 39

ORDER granting 38 Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TRUSTEES OF THE IRON WORKERS’ LOCAL NO. 25 PENSION FUND; IRON WORKERS’ HEALTH FUND OF EASTERN MICHIGAN; IRON WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 VACATION PAY FUND; and IRON WORKERS’ APPRENTICE FUND OF EASTERN MICHIGAN, Trust Funds Established and Administered Pursuant to Federal Law, Paul D. Borman United States District Judge Case Number: 2:10-cv-12502-PDB-MKM Plaintiff, v. MUNICIPAL & INDUSTRIAL STORAGE, INC., a Michigan Corporation, and AL LETTINGA, Individually, Defendants, and CHEMICAL BANK, A Michigan Banking Corporation, Intervenor Defendants. _____________________________________/ ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS On March 24, 2011, this Court granted Plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment against Defendants Municipal & Industrial Storage, Inc. (“Municipal”) and its president Al Lettinga (“Lettinga,” collectively “Defendants”) for unpaid fringe benefit contributions Defendants owed Plaintiffs for work completed between the weeks ending March 7, 2010 through October 3, 2010. (Dkt. Nos. 35 & 36.) The Court awarded Plaintiffs $96,275.17 in unpaid contributions and 1 $1,316.15 pursuant to a liquidated damages provision agreed upon by the parties. (Dkt. No. 36 at 10.) As part of the Judgement, the Court ordered that “within 10 days of the date of entry of the Judgment, the Plaintiffs shall move to amend this Judgment to include the mandates of 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2) upon further submission to the Court.” (Id. at 11.) On April 4, 2011, Plaintiffs moved to amend the Judgment and order Defendants to pay $118,563.04. (Dkt. No. 38, Pls.’ Mot. to Amend J. ¶ 11.) That figure includes: (a) $96,275.17 in unpaid contributions for the period of the weeks ending March 7, 2010 through October 3, 2010; (b) $1,316.15 in liquidated damages; (c) $4,190.36 in interest on the unpaid contributions pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(B);1 (d) $4,190.36 in interest on the unpaid contributions pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(C)(i);2 and (e) $12,591.00 in attorney fees and costs from June 15, 2010 through March 31, 2011.3 (Pls.’ Mot. ¶ 11(A)-(E).) For the following reasons, the Court holds Plaintiffs are entitled to only $117,246.89. Section 1132(g)(2) provides that in a successful action brought by a fiduciary on behalf of a plan to enforce 29 U.S.C. § 1145 (governing delinquent contributions to benefit plans), the court shall award the plan: “(A) the unpaid contributions, (B) interest on the unpaid contributions, (C) an amount equal to the greater of – (i) interest on the unpaid contributions, or (ii) liquidated damages 1 Attached to Plaintiffs’ motion a memo dated April 4, 2010 from CPA Kenneth L. Slate of O’Brien, Rivamonte & Slate P.C., explaining how he calculated this interest amount. (Pls.’ Mot. Ex. B.) 2 Plaintiffs attribute this portion of their demand to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(ii) in their brief, however, no such section exists. Furthermore, the Court assumes Plaintiffs meant to cite section 1132(g)(2)(C)(i) as opposed to (ii) because the former awards the interest amount whereas the latter awards whatever the parties agreed to as liquidated damages. 3 Plaintiffs’ attorney, Matthew I. Henzi, submitted an affidavit testifying that Plaintiffs incurred attorney’s fees of $11,970.00 and costs of $621.00. (Pls.’ Mot. Ex. A.) 2 provided for under the plan . . . , (D) reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of the action . . . , and (D) such other legal or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate.” § 1132(g)(2). As § 1132(g)(2)(C) makes clear, Plaintiffs are not entitled to count the interest on the unpaid contributions and the liquidated damages provision towards its award. The Court shall only award the greater of those two numbers. Because the interest amount of $4,190.36 is greater than the liquidated damages amount of $1,316.15, Plaintiffs are entitled to the former, but not the later, under § 1132(g)(2)(C). Accordingly, the Court holds that under section 1132(g)(2), Plaintiffs are entitled to (A) $96,275.17, (B) $4,190.36, (C) $4,190.36, and (D) $12,591.00 for a total of $117,246.89. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment is entered against Defendants Municipal & Industrial Storage Inc. and Al Lettinga in the amount of $117,246.89. S/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: April 11, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on April 11, 2011. S/Denise Goodine Case Manager 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?