Ballard v. Social Security, Commissioner of
ORDER Adopting 15 Report and Recommendation, Granting Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying Defendant's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment and Remanding Case for Further Proceedings. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (CGre)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
JESSE DEAN BALLARD,
Case No. 10-12518
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT
ARTHUR J. TARNOW
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
R. STEVEN WHALEN
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION , GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT , DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
, AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
On June 24, 2011, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation  that
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment  be granted, that Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment  be denied, and that the case be remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence
four of §405(g), with instructions to consider the June 20, 1997 administrative findings pursuant to
Acquiescence Ruling (“AR”) 98-4.
No objections were filed.
The Court has reviewed the record in this case.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is
entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment  is
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment  is
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is remanded for further proceedings pursuant
to sentence four of §405(g), with instructions to consider the June 20, 1997 administrative findings
pursuant to Acquiescence Ruling (“AR”) 98-4.
DATED: July 18, 2011
S/ARTHUR J. TARNOW
ARTHUR J. TARNOW
United States Senior District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on July 18, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Shawntel R. Jackson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?