Miller v. RWD Technologies, Incorporated
Filing
26
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 plaintiff's emergency Motion to Compel discovery and extend plaintiff's deadline to respond to defendant's renewed motion for summary judgment. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MELISSA MILLER,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 10-12579
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
vs.
RWD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.
__________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT[#22]
The parties appeared by telephone for oral argument on plaintiff’s emergency motion
to compel discovery and extend plaintiff’s deadline to respond to defendant’s renewed
motion for summary judgment, and for the reasons stated on the record,
Plaintiff’s emergency motion to compel discovery and extend plaintiff’s deadline to
respond to defendant’s renewed motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART.
Defendant shall supplement its discovery responses, and provide the requested
documents ordered by the court on or before August 26, 2011.
Plaintiff shall file a response to defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment
on or before September 2, 2011.
Defendant may file a reply brief on or before September 20, 2011.
The hearing date will not change.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 25, 2011
S/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
August 25, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Josephine Chaffee
Deputy Clerk
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?