Miller v. RWD Technologies, Incorporated

Filing 6

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER for release of confidential records and files. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
-MJH Miller v. RWD Technologies, Incorporated Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MELISSA MILLER, Case No. 2:10-CV-12579 Plaintiff, v. RWD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Maryland corporation, Defendant. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sidney L. Frank (P13637) Suanne Tiberio Trimmer (P30274) Melinda A. Balian (P55744) Dawda, Mann, Mulcahy & Sadler, PLC Frank, Haron, Weiner & Navarro 39533 Woodward Avenue, Suite 200 5435 Corporate Drive, Suite 225 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 Troy, MI 48098 (248) 642-3700 (248) 952-0400 Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys for Plaintiff strimmer@dmms.com MBalian@fhwnlaw.com __________________________________________________________________________ PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR RELEASE OF CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS AND FILES Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their counsel of record, stipulate to the entry of this Protective Order relative to the production of confidential, sensitive and/or proprietary information, as requested by either party of the other during the course of discovery in this litigation, on the following terms and conditions: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. All copies of documents produced by either party that they want governed by this Hon. George Caram Steeh Protective Order, shall be numbered sequentially in the lower right hand corner if possible, shall be marked "Confidential" and shall be covered by this Order until such documents and all copies Dockets.Justia.com are returned to the entity that produced them or they are destroyed, pursuant to Section 6 of this Order. 2. The only persons to whom the documents and information therein, subject to this Protective Order, may be disclosed either verbally, visually or otherwise, are as follows: (a) Counsel of record for the parties and any employees of the law firms associated with the counsel for the parties that have a need to know for purposes of pursuing this litigation; Plaintiff and Defendant to this litigation, which includes any key employees of Defendant that have a need to be privy to such information for purposes of pursuing or defending this litigation, and in no event shall Plaintiff use the documents and information covered by this Protective Order for any other purpose; Outside experts not otherwise associated with Plaintiff or Defendant who are retained by Plaintiff's or Defendant's counsel for purposes of pursuing this litigation; Any person indicated on the face of a document covered by this Order to be the author or recipient, but only as to said document; Court reporters and deposition transcript transcribers; Any other person agreed upon by the counsel of record for all parties, with such agreement being confirmed in writing and signed by each such counsel or otherwise memorialized by agreement of counsel; and The Court, and in conjunction with motions, hearings, facilitation, settlement, discovery and/or trial, and under conditions satisfactory to preserve the parties' rights to maintain the confidentiality of their documents and information. (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) 3. All persons designated in paragraph 2 above, shall be required to acknowledge their obligation of maintaining in the strictest confidence any documents or information produced pursuant to this Protective Order, by being advised by Plaintiff's or Defendant's attorney of this Order and its terms and conditions before having access to any such information. 4. In the event the party receiving documents ("receiving party") seeks to challenge the appropriateness of the "Confidential" designation for any documents produced by the other party ("producing party"), the receiving party shall consult in good faith with the producing party 2 in an effort to resolve the matter on an informal basis. In the event no agreement is reached, the burden shall be on the receiving party to seek an order from the Court permitting disclosure of the disputed material beyond the confines of the Protective Order. The receiving party shall give no less than five (5) days written notice to the producing party before seeking such an order, identifying with as much specificity as possible, the document that the receiving party contends is not entitled to confidential protection. Any document to which such a motion is made shall continue to be treated as confidential until the Court renders a decision or the motion is otherwise resolved. 5. The parties agree that they will, at all times while this Order is in effect and after it expires or otherwise terminates, maintain the strictest confidence with regard to the documents produced by the other party pursuant to this Order, including information they learn from such documents, and they agree not to use such documents or information other than to pursue this litigation. 6. It is further ordered that upon termination of this litigation, all documents and other information which have been produced pursuant to this Protective Order and all copies thereof shall be returned to the party that produced them or be otherwise disposed of by counsel. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 26, 2010 s/George Caram Steeh United States District Judge Approved as to form and substance: /s/ Melinda A. Balian Melinda A. Balian (P55744) Attorney for Plaintiff Date: 7/26/10 /s/ Suanne Tiberio Trimmer Suanne Tiberio Trimmer (P30274) Attorney for Defendant Date: 7/26/10 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?