Lee v. Willey et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 75 Defendant Mehra's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 76 Defendant Schneeman's Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 97 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CHem)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 10-12625
Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds
Dean Willey, et al.,
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
Before the Court is Defendant Kameshwari Mehra’s objections to Magistrate Judge
Randon’s August 22, 2012 report and recommendation.
The Court, being fully advised in the premises, having reviewed the record and
pleadings, and having reviewed the objections to the report and recommendation,
OVERRULES Defendant Mehra’s objections to the report and recommendation and
ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the report and recommendation in full.
The Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant Mehra’s motion for summary
judgment. (Dkt. 75.) The Court grants Defendant Mehra’s motion with respect to Plaintiff’s
deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, cruel and unusual punishment, failure to
train and supervise, violation of Michigan’s ECLRA, violation of equal protection rights, and
intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against Defendant Mehra–those claims are
dismissed with prejudice.
The Court denies Defendant Mehra’s motion with respect to the deliberate
indifference to safety claim against Defendant Mehra in his individual capacity– that claim
The Court grants Defendant Schneeman’s motion for summary judgment in its
entirety. (Dkt. 76.) Defendant Scheeman is therefore dismissed from this case.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds
Nancy G. Edmunds
United States District Judge
Dated: October 15, 2012
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on October 15, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Carol A. Hemeyer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?