Corsetti v. Hackel et al
ORDER Adopting 85 Report and Recommendation, Denying 63 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Joseph Corsetti. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case Number 10-12823
Honorable David M. Lawson
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk
MARK A. HACKEL, DEPUTY CAMPAU, SGT.
SCHULTZ, SGT. B. KUTELL, DEPUTY
MASAKOWSKI, DEPUTY MAZZARELLI,
DEPUTY METRY, DEPUTY FURNO, JANE
DOE, VALERIE WATKINS, JOHN DOE,
JAMES M. BIERNAT, MARGARET
DEMUYNCK, JANE DOE, MICHELL M.
SANBORN, ONVIGBO, JASON MCTEVIA,
ELIZABETH CARVER, SGT. NEUMEYER,
PATRICK RICHARD, and ROBERT
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Presently before the Court is the report issued on April 24, 2012 by Magistrate Judge
Michael J. Hluchaniuk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that this Court deny the
plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Although the magistrate judge’s report explicitly
stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within
fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties’ failure to
file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit
Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object
to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and
conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [dkt.
#85] is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction [dkt. #63]
s/David M. Lawson
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge
Dated: May 14, 2012
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served
upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first
class U.S. mail on May 14, 2012.
s/Deborah R. Tofil
DEBORAH R. TOFIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?