Sanders v. Prisoner Health Services, Inc et al

Filing 64

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 56 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 51 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Denying 48 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Howard Sanders and Granting 43 Motion to Dismiss filed by Michigan Department of Corrections. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (RGun)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION HOWARD JAMAL SANDERS #249473, Plaintiff, No. 10-CV-12846 vs. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, INC., and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AGAINST MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on February 29, 2012 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Chief Judge This Section 1983 prisoner civil rights matter is presently before the Court on the September 7, 2011 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives recommending that the Court (1) grant Defendant Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”)’s Motion to Dismiss; (2) deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and (3) deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Objections, and the Court’s entire file of this action, the Court has concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Defendant MDOC’s motion should be granted and Plaintiff’s motions should be denied. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation of September 7, 2011 [Dkt. # 56] be, and hereby is, adopted by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Defendant Michigan Department of Corrections’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 43] be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 48] is DENIED. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Michigan Department of Corrections are DISMISSED, with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Dkt. # 51] is DENIED. s/Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: February 29, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on February 29, 2012, by electronic mail and upon Howard Jamal Sanders, #249473, G. Robert Cotton correctional Facility, 3510 N. Elm Road, Jackson, MI 49201 by ordinary mail. s/Ruth A. Gunther Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?