Sosa et al v. Detroit, City of et al

Filing 7

ORDER denying 5 Motion for Default Judgment Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Caleb Sosa, a minor, by his next friend Amparo Hernandez-Sosa, and Amparao Hernandez-Sosa, Plaintiffs, v. City of Detroit, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs filed this action on July 21, 2010. On November 16, 2010, Plaintiffs filed the instant motion seeking entry of a default judgment against Defendants. (Docket Entry No. 5). "An entry of default and an entry of default judgment are two separate events or steps. The first step is the entry of default when it is shown, by affidavit or otherwise, that a defending party on a claim has failed to plead or otherwise defend. The second step is the entry of default judgment." 46 Am. Jur. 2d Judgments § 233. The custom and practice in this Court is that a clerk's entry of a default is a prerequisite to obtaining a default judgment from the district court. See e.g., Dahill Management, LLC v. Moore, 2009 WL 1664559 (E.D. Mich. 2009) (Wherein Chief Judge Gerald Rosen explained that "[t]his Court requires that the Plaintiff first obtain a clerks's entry of default" before seeking a default judgment from the district court.). The docket reflects that Plaintiffs have not yet sought or obtained a clerk's entry of default as to Defendants. Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment. Case No. 10-12878 Honorable Sean F. Cox IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Sean F. Cox Sean F. Cox United States District Judge Dated: December 7, 2010 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on December 7, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Jennifer Hernandez Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?