Swift v. Detroit, City of et al
Filing
127
ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE, Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (Ciesla, C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WALTER SWIFT,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Civil Action No. 10-cv-12911
HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
MAG. JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN
CITY OF DETROIT, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE
On July 18, 2013, the City of Detroit filed a voluntary petition for protection under
Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. On July 25, 2013, Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes entered an
order confirming the automatic stay of all proceedings against the City under section 922 of the
Bankruptcy Code upon the filing of the petition. See In re City of Detroit, No. 13-53846 (Bankr.
E.D. Mich. July 25, 2013). The stay applies to “judicial, administrative, or other action[s] or
proceeding[s] against an officer or inhabitant of the City, including the issuance or employment of
process, that seeks to enforce a claim against the City.” Id. at 3. The present action has been
commenced by the plaintiff against the City of Detroit and officers of the City of Detroit seeking to
recover damages by enforcing a claim against the City of Detroit, which by law may be obliged to
satisfy a judgment rendered against such officers.
The Court must therefore stay and
administratively close this matter. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that proceedings in this case are stayed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is closed for administrative and statistical
purposes without prejudice. This closing does not constitute a decision on the merits.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the bankruptcy stay is lifted then the case may
be reopened upon the motion of any party.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any party may apply to the bankruptcy court for
relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)-(g).
S/ Bernard A. Friedman__________________
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 12, 2013
Detroit, Michigan
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?