Vandelinder v. Snow et al
Filing
12
ORDER denying 8 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
Vandelinder v. Snow et al
Doc. 12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION STEVEN VANDELINDER, #208357, Plaintiff, v. KENDALL SNOW, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND CERTIFYING THAT APPEAL CANNOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for a certificate of appealability concerning the Court's September 3, 2010 dismissal of his pro se civil rights complaint which was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court concluded that Plaintiff's complaint was duplicative to the complaint filed in Vandelinder v. Snow, et al., No. 2:08-CV-11584 (E.D. Mich. July 31, 2008), which was summarily dismissed by another judge in this district. The Court also noted that Plaintiff had filed a motion for relief from judgment in his prior case, and to the extent that he was seeking to file a new complaint raising the same claims, such action was barred on res judicata grounds. Plaintiff now seeks to appeal the dismissal of his duplicative action. Having reviewed the motion and considered the matter, the Court concludes that an appeal from the Court's dismissal order would be frivolous and cannot be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997). CASE NO. 2:10-CV-13111 HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for a certificate of appealability and certifies that an appeal cannot be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: December 21, 2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on December 21, 2010. S/Denise Goodine Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?