Greenlaw v. Detroit, City of et al
Filing
8
ORDER remanding state law claims to Wayne County Circuit Court. Signed by District Judge Nancy G Edmunds. (PPau)
-MJH Greenlaw v. Detroit, City of et al
Doc. 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Kyle Greenlaw, Plaintiff, v. The City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, and Detroit Officer Thomas Enrique Jackson, Defendants. ________________________________________/ ORDER REMANDING PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS TO WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT Plaintiff Kyle Greenlaw filed suit against Defendants, The City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, and Detroit Officer Thomas Enrique Jackson, in this Court on August 11, 2010. While Plaintiff's complaint does allege violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the United States Constitution, Plaintiff's complaint also presents claims based on state law. Since the parties to this matter are nondiverse, this Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the latter claims so as to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994). Thus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c), all of Plaintiff's claims based on state law, including, but not limited to, Motor Vehicle Exception to governmental immunity and gross negligence against defendant driver (Count I and Count II), assault and battery (Count III), and PIP benefits against the City No. 10-13176 Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds
Dockets.Justia.com
of Detroit (Count V) are hereby REMANDED TO WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT. This Court will retain jurisdiction over Plaintiff's federal claims only.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge Dated: August 26, 2010 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on August 26, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Carol A. Hemeyer Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?