Lindensmith v. Jerone et al

Filing 29

ORDER Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Bill Adams, Melissa Jerome, Wayne Deverney, Billy Ray Thompson,and denying 27 Motion for Contempt filed by David Lindensmith Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (CMul)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DAVID LINDENSMITH,
Plaintiff,
vs.

Civil Action No. 10-CV-13530
HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

MELISSA JEROME, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon has filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)
in which he recommends that the court deny defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to their
exhaustion argument and that the court deny defendants’ motion without prejudice as to their
remaining arguments. The R&R also recommends that the court permit defendants to file another
dispositive motion (which they did shortly after the R&R was issued) addressing various issues. No
party has objected to the R&R and the time for doing so has expired. The court finds the R&R
persuasive and its recommendation sound. The court therefore accepts and adopts the R&R as the
findings and conclusions of the court. Additionally, plaintiff’s motion for contempt [docket entry
27] is denied.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 25, 2011
Detroit, Michigan

S/Bernard A. Friedman__________________
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE