Malouf v. Detroit Medical Center et al

Filing 20

ORDER denying 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOSEPH N. MALOUF, III, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 10-cv-14763 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge THE DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER d/b/a/ SINAI-GRACE HOSPITAL, and CATHY DOCKERY Defendants. _______________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Dkt. No. 19) Plaintiff Joseph N. Malouf, III, proceeding pro se, filed the Complaint in this matter on December 1, 2010 (Dkt. No. 1). Plaintiff alleges that his employment with Defendants was terminated as retaliation for his filing an EEOC complaint claiming that he was sexually harassed by a female supervisor. On December 3, 2010, the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3). Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel, filed on April 20, 2011 (Dkt. No. 19). Plaintiff’s Motion consists of two sentences, which state as follows: The plaintiff in the above entitled matter hereby moves the court for an order appointing legal counsel to act on his behalf The court has already approved the plaintiff’s application to file the matter in forma pauperis. 1 (Pl.’s Mot. 1-2). Appointment of counsel in a civil case is only appropriate in exceptional cases with complex factual and legal issues. See Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 605-06 (6th Cir. 1993). No exceptional circumstances exist in this case. See Marshall v. Federal Exp. Corp., 12 Fed. Appx. 186, 188 (6th Cir. Nov. 30, 2000) (unpublished). Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel is therefore DENIED. SO ORDERED. S/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: May 2, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means and Joseph N Malouf 27073 Baldwin Avenue Warren, MI 48092 by U.S. Mail on May 2, 2011. S/Denise Goodine Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?