Seals v. Scutt et al

Filing 58

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 55 Report and Recommendation, 46 Motion to Dismiss filed by V Stevenson, 51 Motion to Dismiss filed by Prisoner Health Services, Incorporated Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NICHOLAS SEALS, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 10-15054 Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff v. DEBRA SCUTT, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff filed this case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants failed to provide him with adequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. This matter is currently before the Court on Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub’s Report and Recommendation (Docket #55), wherein the Magistrate Judge recommends that: (1) Defendant Stevenson’s Motion to Dismiss be denied, (2) Defendant Prison Health Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss be granted, and (3) Defendants Scutt, Gardon, Clement, Murphy, Upston, Neff, Edelman, Ives, Aetna Insurance Company, and Correctional Medical Services, Inc. be dismissed from this action. The Court received no objections to the Report and Recommendation. After a thorough review of the court file and the Report and Recommendation, this Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation and enter it as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Therefore, for the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby ORDERS that: (1) Defendant Stevenson’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket #46) is DENIED, (2) Defendant Prison Health Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket #51) is GRANTED, and (3) Defendants Scutt, Gardon, Clement, Murphy, Upston, Neff, Edelman, Ives, Aetna Insurance Company, and Correctional Medical Services, Inc. are DISMISSED from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2014 S/Lawrence P. Zatkoff LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?