Seals v. Scutt et al
Filing
80
ORDER Directing Corizon Health to Provide Under Seal the Address for Un-served Defendant K. Nibbelink - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. (LBar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
NICHOLAS SEALS,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-15054
Plaintiff,
vs.
HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS
DEBRA SCUTT, et al.,
Defendants.
HONORABLE MONA K. MAJZOUB
/
ORDER DIRECTING CORIZON HEALTH TO PROVIDE
UNDER SEAL ADDRESS FOR UNSERVED DEFENDANT K. NIBBELINK
This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s
application to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted. This matter comes before the Court after
service was attempted by the United States Marshals. On August 18, 2015 Corizon Health sent a
letter stating that CMS is not longer a working entity and that Corizon Health is the successor to
CMS. Cozizon Health also stated that it does not have the authority to accept service for CMS
former employee K. Nibblelink. The last known address of Defendant K. Nibblelink is needed for
the U.S. Marshal to attempt again service of process.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before September 15, 2015 Corizon Health is
to file under seal, as authorized by E.D. Mich. LR 5.1 and 5.3 and the ECF Filing Policies and
Procedures, and pursuant to this Order, the last known address or proper service address for
Defendant K. Nibbleink.
NOTICE TO PARTIES
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), the parties have a period of fourteen days from the date of
this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as may be permissible under
28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).
Dated: September 1, 2015
s/ Mona K. Majzoub
MONA K. MAJZOUB
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PROOF OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of this Order was served upon Corizon Health, Nicholas Seals
and Counsel of Record on this date.
Dated: September 1, 2015
s/ Lisa C. Bartlett
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?