Norton et al v. Zubkoff et al
Filing
55
ORDER denying 54 Motion for entry of judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KENNETH NORTON and KENDALE FARMS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 10-15104
Honorable David M. Lawson
RICHARD P. ZUBKOFF, THOMAS LICKTEIG,
and MOWTEQ, LLC,
Defendants.
___________________________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
The matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment against Thomas
Lickteig. On June 26, 2012, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and
against defendant Lickteig on the plaintiffs’ claims for fraud, negligent representation, detrimental
reliance, and negligent concealment. The plaintiffs now seek the entry of a judgment in the amount
of $747,475.49 against defendant Lickteig.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) provides that “[w]hen an action presents more than
one claim for relief . . . , the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer
than all, claims . . . only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay.” The
commentary explains that the rule “was originally adopted . . . to avoid the possible injustice of a
delay in judgment of a distinctly separate claim to await adjudication of the entire case.”
Commentary, 1946 amend. The rule as written imposes two requirements before judgment may be
entered on less than all claims: 1) the decision must “entirely resolve[]” an individual claim, and
2) there must be “no just reason for delay.” Lowery v. Fed. Express Corp., 426 F.3d 817, 821 (6th
Cir. 2005).
The order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment
does not entirely resolve any of the plaintiffs’ claims. Therefore, the Court will deny the plaintiffs’
motion.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment [dkt. #54]
is DENIED.
s/David M. Lawson
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge
Dated: August 13, 2012
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served
upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first
class U.S. mail on August 13, 2012.
s/Deborah R. Tofil
DEBORAH R. TOFIL
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?