Megivern v. Glacier Hills Incorporated

Filing 31

ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule as to 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment :( Responses due by 12/12/2011, Replies due by 12/19/2011, Motion Hearing re-set for 1/25/2012 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TAIMI MEGIVERN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:11-cv-10026 GLACIER HILLS INC., Defendant. / ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND AMENDING OCTOBER 13, 2011 NOTICE OF HEARING On November 28, 2011, the court conducted a telephone conference in the above-captioned matter. During the conference, the court discussed with the parties the briefing schedule and hearing date for Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, by December 12, 2011, Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant’s “Motion for Summary Judgment” [Dkt. # 22]. If Defendant wishes to file a reply brief supporting its motion, it must do so by December 19, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court’s October 13, 2011 “Notice of Hearing” [Dkt. # 27] is AMENDED. Counsel are DIRECTED to appear before the Honorable Robert H. Cleland, United States District Judge, on January 25, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., in Room 712, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette Blvd., Detroit, Michigan 48226, for oral argument on Defendant’s “Motion for Summary Judgment” [Dkt. # 22]. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 30, 2011 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, November 30, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\11-10026.MEGIVERN.BrSchedMotSummJ.set.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?