Jordan v. Detroit, City of et al
Filing
45
ORDER Terminating as Moot 38 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and directing plaintiff and defendants to make Rule 26 disclosures and respond to requests by 10/18/2011. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JASMINE GUY JORDAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 11-10153
CITY OF DETROIT, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND
DIRECTING PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS CITY OF DETROIT AND WAYNE
COUNTY TO MAKE RULE 26 DISCLOSURES AND RESPOND TO RULE 34
REQUESTS BY OCTOBER 18, 2011
On September 16, 2011, Plaintiff Jasmine Guy Jordan filed a Motion to Compel
seeking an order to compel Defendants City of Detroit and Wayne County to make
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 initial disclosures and to respond to Plaintiff’s Rule
34 requests for the production of documents. On October 6, 2011, the court held a
telephonic conference with counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants Wayne County and City
of Detroit, at which time counsel mutually agreed to make Rule 26 initial disclosures and
respond to Rule 34 requests on or before October 18, 2011. The court will thus
terminate as moot Plaintiff’s motion. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel [Dkt. #38] is TERMINATED
AS MOOT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff and Defendants City of Detroit and
Wayne County are DIRECTED to make all necessary Rule 26 initial disclosures and to
respond to any outstanding Rule 34 requests for the production of documents on or
before October 18, 2011.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 7, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, October 7, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\11-10153.JORDAN.Term.Mot.Compel.jrc.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?