United States of America v. Currency $79,000.00
Filing
8
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Civil No. 11-10442
Honorable Denise Page Hood
Magistrate Michael J. Hluchaniuk
v.
SEVENTY-NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS
($79,000) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY,
Defendants in rem,
________________________________________/
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT
AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
WHEREAS, on or about February 8, 2011, Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
filed a First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture against Seventy-Nine Thousand Dollars
($79,000) in United States Currency;
WHEREAS the Plaintiff, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the Claimant, BI
XIN LIU, wish to resolve this matter without further litigation and expense;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, through its counsel, BARBARA A. McQUADE, United States
Attorney, and JULIE A. BECK, Assistant United States Attorney, and Claimant BI XIN LIU,
through her attorney, EDGAR L. FANKBONNER, as follows:
1)
This action is a civil in rem forfeiture action brought pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §§
5317(c) and 5332(c).
1
2) This Court has jurisdiction and venue over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§§ 1345,
1355 and 1395.
3) The allegations of the First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture are well taken, and the
United States and its agents had reasonable cause for seeking forfeiture of the above-enumerated
property as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2465. The Government’s position in this action is
substantially justified as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B).
4) The parties herein wish to resolve this matter without incurring further litigation
expenses. As such, the United States agrees that fifty per cent (50%) of the Seventy-Nine
Thousand Dollars ($79,000) defendant currency, that is, a sum of Thirty-Nine Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars ($39,500.00), shall NOT be forfeited, but shall be RETURNED to Claimant BI
XIN LIU, less any debt owed to the United States, any agency of the United States, or any other
debt which the United States is authorized to collect.
5) The parties agree that no other costs or charges shall be assessed against the amount
of $39,500.00 the Claimant is to receive under paragraph 4.
6) The parties further stipulate that the remaining Thirty-Nine Thousand Five Hundred
Dollars ($39,500.00) of the defendant currency, including any interest that may have accrued on
the entire amount of the defendant currency since the seizure date, shall be FORFEITED to the
United States of America pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §§ 5317(c) and 5332(c), and that any
administrative costs incurred by the government shall be deducted from this amount. Further,
any right, title or interest of BI XIN LIU, and her successors and assigns, and any right, title and
ownership interest of all other persons in the $39,500.00 in United States currency together with
interest earned, if any, is hereby and forever EXTINGUISHED, and that clear title to said
2
currency shall hereby be VESTED in the United States of America, and the United States
Department of Homeland Security is AUTHORIZED to dispose of such currency according to
law.
7) Claimant, hereby knowingly and voluntarily waives any and all right to
reimbursement by the United States of reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs in connection
with this civil forfeiture action under 28 U.S.C. § 2465(b)(1)(A) or any other statute that might
conceivably apply.
8) Claimant BI XIN LIU agrees to release, remise and discharge Plaintiff, the United
States of America, and any of its agencies involved in this matter, including the United States
Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection, and the Department of
Justice, including the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and their agents, officers and employees, past and
present, from all claims or causes of action which Claimant and his agents, officers, employees,
assignees and/or successors in interest have, may have had or may have on account of the events
or circumstances giving rise to the above-captioned action.
9) Following entry of this Consent Judgment and Final Order of Forfeiture and receipt
by the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Automated Clearing House (ACH) information, including
Claimant’s social security number, the United States Department of Homeland Security, or its
delegate, shall disburse the funds via electronic deposit into the IOLTA account of Claimant’s
attorney.
10) Upon the making of the payment specified in paragraph 9 above, this case shall be
dismissed WITH PREJUDICE and closed.
11)
Each of the parties to this Stipulation have discussed this settlement with their
3
respective counsel, and fully understand its terms and conditions and the consequences
of entering into it. The parties agree that each shall bear their own costs in this matter.
BARBARA L. McQUADE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
s/JULIE A. BECK
JULIE A. BECK
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
211 W. Fort Street
Detroit, Michigan 48226
(313) 226-9717
Email:julie.beck@usdoj.gov
P-53291
s/EDGAR L. FANKBONNER
EDGAR L. FANKBONNER
Attorney for Claimant
401 Broadway, Suite 306
New York , NY 10013
Phone: (212)431-9380
Email: fankbonner@gmail.com
Dated: 10/27/11
Dated: 10/24/11
s/BI XIN LIU (signature page attached)
BI XIN LIU
Claimant
Dated: 10/24/11
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Civil No. 11-10442
Honorable Denise Page Hood
Magistrate Michael J. Hluchaniuk
v.
SEVENTY-NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS
($79,000) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY,
Defendants in rem,
________________________________________/
CONSENT JUDGMENT
AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Denise Page Hood
United States District Judge
Dated: October 31, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on
October 31, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?