Myers v. Training and Treatment Innovations et al
Filing
10
ORDER granting in part 3 defendants' Motion to Dismiss and denying motion for more definite statement as moot. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
GAYLE M. MYERS,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 11-10802
vs.
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
TRAINING AND TREATMENT
INNOVATIONS, et al.
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
AND DENYING MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AS MOOT [DOC. 3]
This matter has come before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss and for a
more definite statement. The court heard oral argument by the parties on June 23,
2011. Now, therefore, for the reasons stated on the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s
Whistleblowers’ Protection Act claim is GRANTED. The individual defendants’ motion
to dismiss plaintiff’s Americans with Disabilities Act claim is GRANTED. Defendants’
motion for a more definite statement is DENIED as moot because the court has
accepted plaintiff’s amended complaint [doc. 9]. The only claim remaining in the case is
plaintiff’s Americans with Disabilities Act claim against her employer, defendant Training
and Treatment Innovations.
In addition, plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
Dated: June 27, 2011
S/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
June 27, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also to
Gayle M. Myers at 31829 Harlo Drive Apt B, Madison Heights,
MI 48071.
S/Josephine Chaffee
Deputy Clerk
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?