Frickco Incorporated v. Nehmeh Enterprises, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER granting Motion for Leave to File first amended class action complaint and to add party defendants 23 and denying Motions to Dismiss 12 21 as moot. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FRICKCO INCORPORATED, a Michigan corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, Case No. 11-CV-11168 HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH v. NEHMEH ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a LITTLE CAESAR’S, LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC., LITTLE CAESAR DETROIT DMA ADVERTISING PROGRAM, INC., and CAESAR FUND, INC., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND TO ADD PARTY DEFENDANTS (#23) AND DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS (#12 AND #21) AS MOOT On March 22, 2011, plaintiff filed a class action complaint alleging defendants violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. §227, by sending unsolicited advertising faxes to plaintiff and others, and alleging conversion on the same basis. On April 15, 2011, defendants Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc., Little Caesar Detroit DMA Advertising Program, Inc., and Caesar Fund, Inc. (the “Little Caesar defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss. Upon stipulation of the parties, the time for defendant Nehmeh Enterprises, Inc. (“Nehmeh”) to respond to the complaint was extended to May 16, 2011. On May 10, 2011, defendant Nehmeh filed a motion to dismiss. On May 11, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint and to add parties. Plaintiff seeks leave to add Ali Nehmeh, Capitol Communications, Inc., and Lester Morales as additional party defendants, and to dismiss without prejudice the Little Caesar defendants. The Little Caesar defendants assent to plaintiff’s motion. Defendant Nehmeh does not assent to plaintiff’s motion. However, as noted by plaintiff, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B) allows a plaintiff to amend its complaint without leave within twenty-one days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b). Because plaintiff filed its motion and first amended complaint within twenty-one days after service of defendant Nehmeh’s motion to dismiss, and the Little Caesar defendants agree to the amendment, plaintiff’s request for leave to amend is granted. While making no determinations regarding the sufficiency of plaintiff’s first amended complaint, the court believes the pending motions to dismiss are moot in light of the new pleading. Defendants may file a new motion within the applicable time limit. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to file first amended complaint and add party defendants is GRANTED, defendant Nehmeh’s motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice as moot, defendants Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc., Little Caesar Detroit DMA Advertising Program, Inc., and Caesar Fund, Inc.’s motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice as moot, and defendants Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc., Little Caesar Detroit DMA Advertising Program, Inc., and Caesar Fund, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 17, 2011 s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on May 17, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Marcia Beauchemin Deputy Clerk 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?