Springsteen v. Garrett et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-11743
DISTRICT JUDGE PATRICK J. DUGGAN
CATHY M. GARRETT, individually
and in her capacity as Wayne County
Clerk, WAYNE COUNTY, LYNN
M. WADE, CAVEN WEST and
JOHNNIE JOHNSON, individually,
jointly and severally,
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANT WADE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
AND TO QUASH DISCOVERY REQUESTS (DKT. NO. 27)
This matter is before the Court on the above-referenced motion (Dkt. No. 27).
Having reviewed the motion and response thereto, and following a hearing on April 3,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before April 17, 2012, Defendant Wade shall
produce any audio and/or video recording(s) of any kind or format regarding any
communication between Wade and any witness identified on a witness list in this case or
any individual defendant in this case that also:
1) occurred between September 1, 2009 and March 15, 2011 and
2) concerned any Wayne County Clerk operations.
Wade shall also produce any audio or video recording that occurred between March
17, 2011 and the present wherein the subject of Plaintiff’s claims in this lawsuit were
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before April 17, 2012, Wade shall admit
whether any such recordings exist.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Wade shall not be required to respond to any other
production request or request to admit involved in the instant motion.
s/Mark A. Randon
Mark A. Randon
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: April 4, 2012
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the parties of record on this date, April
4, 2012, electronically.
s/Melody R. Miles
Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?