C.F. Stinson, Inc. et al v. Mayer-Paetz, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION C.F. STINSON, INC. and SAMPLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:11-cv-11926 MAYER-PAETZ, INC., d/b/a MAYER FABRICS, Defendant. / ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Plaintiffs initiated this action on May 2, 2011, and Defendant has yet to answer the complaint or file any motions. On November 9, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action “without a court order” by filing “a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Although Plaintiffs’ notice effectively dismissed this matter, the court here confirms that dismissal for the sake of docket clarity. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED in accordance with Rule 41(a)(1)(B). s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 16, 2011 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, November 16, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\SET\Opinions and Orders\11-11926.C.F.STINSON.VoluntaryDismissal.set.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?