C.F. Stinson, Inc. et al v. Mayer-Paetz, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

C.F. STINSON, INC. and SAMPLE
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No. 2:11-cv-11926

MAYER-PAETZ, INC.,
d/b/a MAYER FABRICS,
Defendant.
/
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
Plaintiffs initiated this action on May 2, 2011, and Defendant has yet to answer
the complaint or file any motions. On November 9, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a notice of
voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Rule
41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action “without a court order” by filing “a
notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
summary judgment.” Although Plaintiffs’ notice effectively dismissed this matter, the
court here confirms that dismissal for the sake of docket clarity. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED in accordance
with Rule 41(a)(1)(B).

s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: November 16, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, November 16, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
[phone]

S:\Cleland\SET\Opinions and Orders\11-11926.C.F.STINSON.VoluntaryDismissal.set.wpd

2