51382 Gratiot Avenue Holdings, LLC v. Chesterfield Development Company, LLC

Filing 57

ORDER terminating as moot 55 Motion for Protective Order; 56 Motion to Expedite; 56 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 51382 GRATIOT AVENUE HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No. 11-CV-12047 v. CHESTERFIELD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, et al., Defendants. / ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO EXPEDITE CONSIDERATION OF ITS EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER On September 9, 2011, Plaintiff filed an emergency motion seeking a protective order as to the timing of the deposition of its expert witness, Bruce G. Knapp. Plaintiff also filed a motion to expedite consideration of its emergency motion, as Defendants had noticed Mr. Knapp’s deposition for September 13, 2011. On the afternoon of September 9, 2011, the court conducted a telephone conference regarding this matter. During the conference, the parties informed the court that the issues underlying Plaintiff’s emergency motion had been resolved. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Emergency Motion for Protective Order” [Dkt. # 55] and Plaintiff’s “Emergency Motion to Expedite Consideration of Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Protective Order” [Dkt. # 56] are TERMINATED AS MOOT. S/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 13, 2011 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, September 13, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\11-12047.51382GRATIOTAVEHOLDINGS.TerminateEmerMotProtOrder.set.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?