United States of America v. Currency $50,692.46 From Dearborn Village Community Credit Union Account No. 367929 et al
Filing
18
ORDER STAYING civil forfeiture case and administratively closing case. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Civil Case No. 2:11-cv-12111
vs.
Honorable George Caram Steeh
FIFTY THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED
NINETY TWO DOLLARS AND
FORTY SIX CENTS IN U.S. CURRENCY
($50,692.46) FROM DEARBORN VILLAGE
COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION
ACCOUNT #367929; TWENTY SEVEN
THOUSAND SIXTY DOLLARS AND
FIVE CENTS IN U.S. CURRENCY
($27,060.05) FROM JP MORGAN CHASE
BANK ACCOUNT #722769007; AND NINE
THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY
DOLLARS ($9,890.00) IN U.S. CURRENCY,
Defendants in Rem.
_____________________________________/
ORDER STAYING CIVIL FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS
AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE
Upon the accompanying Stipulation for Stay of Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and the
Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, now, therefore;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all proceedings in this civil forfeiture case shall be
stayed until further order of the Court, without prejudice to either party to seek an advance
termination or an extension of the stay.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall promptly inform the
Claimants through counsel, if any, of the culmination or termination of the criminal
investigation, whether by discontinuance or by the initiation of criminal prosecution.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon termination of the stay, the parties may move
to reopen the case and shall be afforded a reasonable time to conclude discovery, file dispositive
motions, and file all witness lists prior to any pretrial or trial proceedings.
Dated: September 8, 2011
s/George Caram Steeh
HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?