Jones v. Prison Health Services, Incorporated et al

Filing 78

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 62 Motion to Dismiss filed by Yasir Zaidi, 73 Report and Recommendation Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SCOTT JONES, Plaintiff, Case No. 11-12134 v. Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, et al., Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint with the Court alleging that Defendants— Prison Health Services; Doctors Pragna Pandya, David Sharp, Adam Edelman, Zavit Cohen, Yasir Zaidi, John Doe 1-20; and the Michigan Department of Corrections— violated his civil rights by denying or delaying medical care for his alleged cancer [dkt 1]. Defendant Yasir Zaidi (“Zaidi”) moved for dismissal on the grounds that, inter alia, he is not a state actor [dkt 62]. The matter currently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michelson’s Report and Recommendation [dkt 73], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends granting Zaidi’s motion. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time period within which he must do so has expired. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the court file, Zaidi’s motion, and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Based on this review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and enters it as the findings and conclusions of this Court Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Zaidi’s motion to dismiss [dkt 62] is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Lawrence P. Zatkoff LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 17, 2012 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of this Order was served upon the attorneys of record by electronic or U.S. mail on July 17, 2012. S/Marie E. Verlinde Case Manager (810) 984-3290

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?