Lane v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 12

ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendation Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (SJa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JANET L. LANE, Plaintiff, Case No. 11-12230 Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on September 12, 2012 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court On November 16, 2011, Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Janet L. Lane’s motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R & R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties’ underlying cross-motions for summary judgment, and the record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety. Accordingly, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s November 16, 2011 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (docket #8) is DENIED, and that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (docket #9) is GRANTED. s/Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: September 12, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on September 12, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Shawntel Jackson for Ruth A. Gunther Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?