Lane v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
12
ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendation Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (SJa)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JANET L. LANE,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 11-12230
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder
v.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
At a session of said Court, held in
the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan
on September 12, 2012
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
On November 16, 2011, Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Janet L. Lane’s
motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social
Security’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R & R.
Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties’ underlying cross-motions for summary judgment,
and the record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge,
and adopts the R & R in its entirety.
Accordingly,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s
November 16, 2011 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this
Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that Plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment (docket #8) is DENIED, and that Defendant’s motion for
summary judgment (docket #9) is GRANTED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: September 12, 2012
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on September 12, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Shawntel Jackson for Ruth A. Gunther
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?