Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER withdrawing 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION VISUAL INTERACTIVE PHONE CONCEPTS, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff Plaintiff Mag. Judge Laurie Michelson vs. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Case No. 11-cv-12348 Defendant. STIPULATION AND ORDER WITHDRAWING GOOGLE, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT, DKT. NO. 11 This matter having come before the Court upon stipulation of Plaintiff Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc., and Defendant Google, Inc., and the Court otherwise being fully advised in the premises: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Google, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss, Or In the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement, Dkt. No. 11, is WITHDRAWN, without fees or costs to either party. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 11, 2011 s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff Honorable Lawrence P. Zatkoff Stipulated as to form and entry: MANTESE HONIGMAN ROSSMAN and WILLIAMSON, P.C. DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC s/ Ian M. Williamson______________ Gerard V. Mantese (P34424) gmantese@manteselaw.com Ian M. Williamson (P65056) iwilliamson@manteselaw.com Brendan H. Frey (P70893) bfrey@manteselaw.com 1361 E. Big Beaver Road Troy, MI 48083 (248) 457-9200 (telephone) (248) 457-9201 (facsimile) s/ Michelle L. Alamo Michelle L. Alamo (P60684) 500 Woodward Ave, Suite 4000 Detroit, Michigan 48226 Tel: 313.223.3500 Fax: 313.223.3598 malamo@dickinsonwright.com Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc. KOHN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Kenneth I. Kohn (P35170) k.kohn@kohnandassociates.com Barbara Mandell (P36437) b.mandell@kohnandassociates.com 30500 Northwestern Hwy, Suite 410 Farmington Hills, MI 48334 (248) 539-5050 (telephone) (248) 539-5055 (facsimile) Attorneys for Plaintiff Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?