Sanders v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al

Filing 61

OPINION ANDORDER Adopting 60 Report and Recommendation Granting 51 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Washington. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION HOWARD SANDERS, #249473, Plaintiff, Case No. 11-12563 v. Paul D. Borman United States District Judge MAJOR WASHINGTON, R. Steven Whalen United States Magistrate Judge Defendant. ______________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER: ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 60); AND GRANTING DEFENDANT WASHINGTON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 51) Before the Court is Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen’s Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Defendant Major Washington’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 60, Report and Recommendation). Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(b), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 60); GRANTS Defendant Washington’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 51); and as Defendant Washington was the sole remaining Defendant in this action, DISMISSES the Complaint with PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2015 s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on January 26, 2015. s/Deborah Tofil Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?